![]() ![]() The district attorney's office didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on the judge's decision.Rabia Chaudry, a Maryland attorney who is identified in the series as an “advocate” for Syed, is an executive producer and prominently featured talking head, so how could the film not favor her point of view?įollowers of the case from its earliest days will remember Chaudry as a driving force on social media and behind the scenes fighting for Syed’s innocence. On top of that, defense attorneys plan on suing the state, county and district attorney's office for wrongful prosecution, he said. “In my over 30 years of trying cases, I've never experienced such a magical moment where I'm able to see justice come to light so vividly.”ĭubin said he expects the state Victims Compensation Board to approve the nearly $900,000 in compensation due each man under the new law. “Today the judge righted a wrong,” Dubin said. Clay Jacke's decision was "a long, detailed ruling exonerating them for any and all crimes” related to the shooting, said defense attorney Eric Dubin. Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge H. We can go on with our lives,” Glass said Thursday outside the courthouse. For 20 years we’ve been living this nightmare. Rayford is with his high school sweetheart, who waited for him while he was in prison. Glass, 36, and Rayford, 37, now both work as drivers for Walmart. Their case was taken up by the Innocence Rights project at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. The teens, who had no criminal history, maintained from the beginning that they were not involved in the shooting. During a five-year investigation, defense investigators found multiple other witnesses who said, “Oh no, they weren’t the shooters, they never had a gun,” Della Donna said. The convictions of Glass and Rayford relied heavily on the testimony of just two witnesses who later recanted their stories. “We proved their innocence beyond a shadow of a doubt,” Della Donna said. The new statute, which took effect in 2020, gives the defense a chance show that there's a “preponderance of evidence” showing innocence, she said. “There was no evidence tying them to the shooting. “That trial never should have been brought in the first place," defense attorney Annee Della Donna told The Associated Press. Two people were struck by gunfire, but the injuries were not serious, according to court filings.īoth defendants were convicted of 11 counts of attempted murder and sentenced to 11 consecutive life sentences. Glass and Rayford were 17 and 18, respectively, when they were arrested after a shooting during an altercation involving a group of teens in Lancaster, north of Los Angeles. I waited for this day because, you know, I knew I was innocent of every crime they said I committed,” he said.ĭefense attorneys said the case was the first brought under a law that guarantees compensation for defendants who have their cases thrown out and also allows them to present evidence proving their innocence. I thought about it for my last two years being free. I thought about it when I was locked up for 17 years. Rayford, clutching his baby daughter, called it an “amazing” feeling to have their records finally wiped clean and their reputations restored. Outside the courthouse, the men were cheered by family members and supporters. The proceedings included a dramatic confession by the actual shooter, Chad Brandon McZeal, a gang member who’s serving a life sentence for murder in an unrelated case, the defense team said.Īfter the judge ruled, Glass and Rayford embraced each other and their attorneys. The verdicts for Dupree Glass and Juan Rayford concluded a new trial that began in October after a state appeals court panel vacated their convictions and they were freed in 2020. ![]() ![]() Under a new law, the state is required to pay them each $140 for every day they spent behind bars, or about $900,000. LOS ANGELES - Two men who served nearly 17 years in prison after being wrongly convicted of attempted murder after a 2004 shooting were declared innocent Thursday by a California judge.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |